<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Urbane Sprawl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog</link>
	<description>A Provocative View of Cultural and Social Phenomena</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Long Time No Post by luling</title>
		<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/2009/10/long-time-no-post/#comment-4887</link>
		<dc:creator>luling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/?p=179#comment-4887</guid>
		<description>you're back! i'm here! and you're inspiring me too....the only battle of the brows in my life was the one with my tweezers in hand-- so i eagerly await your words- whether or not you come up with the Latest Groundbreaking Analysis! xoxoxo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re back! i&#8217;m here! and you&#8217;re inspiring me too&#8230;.the only battle of the brows in my life was the one with my tweezers in hand&#8211; so i eagerly await your words- whether or not you come up with the Latest Groundbreaking Analysis! xoxoxo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Ever Happened to Ostracism? by Francesca</title>
		<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/2009/10/what-ever-happened-to-ostracism/#comment-4869</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/?p=183#comment-4869</guid>
		<description>This is my favorite post yet.  You are absolutely right - it's already awkward the way the the Times Wedding section selects the "winning" couples (is Ivy League love more profound than the love of state school grads?), but certainly, love born from adultery does not need to be celebrated in such a public forum.  Do you think it would be better if they had profiled that couple but left out the fact that they met while she was still married?  If that detail had just been omitted, I guess it would be less of a tacit approval, but I suppose it would also be misleading reporting.  Ugh, I feel so bad for the jilted first husband reading it.  Just leave them out!

Also, I think Michael Vick is different from these examples because he committed an actual crime, not just a societal or ethical blunder.  Also, I really really love dogs, and I miss enjoying the Eagles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my favorite post yet.  You are absolutely right - it&#8217;s already awkward the way the the Times Wedding section selects the &#8220;winning&#8221; couples (is Ivy League love more profound than the love of state school grads?), but certainly, love born from adultery does not need to be celebrated in such a public forum.  Do you think it would be better if they had profiled that couple but left out the fact that they met while she was still married?  If that detail had just been omitted, I guess it would be less of a tacit approval, but I suppose it would also be misleading reporting.  Ugh, I feel so bad for the jilted first husband reading it.  Just leave them out!</p>
<p>Also, I think Michael Vick is different from these examples because he committed an actual crime, not just a societal or ethical blunder.  Also, I really really love dogs, and I miss enjoying the Eagles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starbucks Baristas and Incentives for Store Activity by JosephM</title>
		<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/2008/10/starbucks-baristas-and-incentives-for-store-activity/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>JosephM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/?p=142#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I think there may be a few reasons why Starbucks would not want to implement a performance based bonus.  First of all, the infrastructure for measuring the impact of the staff at an individual store might prove tricky enough and therefore costly enough that it is not worth the potential increased sales.  For example, establishing the baseline for each store might be difficult.   If it's an established store with years of sale records, thats one thing, although what if sales increase because of changes in the neighborhood that are entirely unrelated to the service or product?  And with new locations--and I have no idea how well-run businesses predict sales at new locations, but in my industry it's highly unreliable--how would you compensate for the inevitable growth in a new area?  Also, I imagine that in some Starbucks areas the demand is so high that the impact of quality ofservice will not have much of an effect either way, say a Starbucks on the ground floor of a financial building in Chicago or New York.  That store has probably already reached saturation because the location is so good, whereas one out in Amarillo, TX (which had phenomenal service, incidentally) may be able to double its share of the market because the location compared to other coffee stores is not a definitive trait.
Now I don't think either of these differences between stores would be a big deal except that employees don't like to feel like they are getting a raw deal, or that their compensation bonus is arbitrary.  I think that means that there would have to be a mechanism in place for responding to unhappy employees who feel like they're not making as much as their friends and colleagues 10 blocks away because of factors they can't control.  It would also mean those employees had their salaries in part dependent on the performance of their co-workers, which might be a source of discontent.  All of these factors would be exacerbated, I think, if Starbucks has high turnover, which I sort of suspect it does, though I really have no idea.  It's hard to build a well functioning team if the players keep changing.  
So that's my two cents.  Really interesting post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I think there may be a few reasons why Starbucks would not want to implement a performance based bonus.  First of all, the infrastructure for measuring the impact of the staff at an individual store might prove tricky enough and therefore costly enough that it is not worth the potential increased sales.  For example, establishing the baseline for each store might be difficult.   If it&#8217;s an established store with years of sale records, thats one thing, although what if sales increase because of changes in the neighborhood that are entirely unrelated to the service or product?  And with new locations&#8211;and I have no idea how well-run businesses predict sales at new locations, but in my industry it&#8217;s highly unreliable&#8211;how would you compensate for the inevitable growth in a new area?  Also, I imagine that in some Starbucks areas the demand is so high that the impact of quality ofservice will not have much of an effect either way, say a Starbucks on the ground floor of a financial building in Chicago or New York.  That store has probably already reached saturation because the location is so good, whereas one out in Amarillo, TX (which had phenomenal service, incidentally) may be able to double its share of the market because the location compared to other coffee stores is not a definitive trait.<br />
Now I don&#8217;t think either of these differences between stores would be a big deal except that employees don&#8217;t like to feel like they are getting a raw deal, or that their compensation bonus is arbitrary.  I think that means that there would have to be a mechanism in place for responding to unhappy employees who feel like they&#8217;re not making as much as their friends and colleagues 10 blocks away because of factors they can&#8217;t control.  It would also mean those employees had their salaries in part dependent on the performance of their co-workers, which might be a source of discontent.  All of these factors would be exacerbated, I think, if Starbucks has high turnover, which I sort of suspect it does, though I really have no idea.  It&#8217;s hard to build a well functioning team if the players keep changing.<br />
So that&#8217;s my two cents.  Really interesting post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The ABC&#8217;s of Web Media by Presencia</title>
		<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/2008/10/the-abcs-of-web-media/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Presencia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/?p=131#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Repeal the Twelfth Amendment by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/2008/10/repeal-the-twelfth-amendment/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/?p=108#comment-25</guid>
		<description>...and take all the fun out of the race?  Remember "potatoE" man Quayle? Come on, the fun part is waiting for the next dopey statement to drop, like the one yesterday. Palin thinks as Vice Pres she gets to run the Senate. I have a response to her: Ms. Palin, I know Dick Cheney and madam, you are no Dick Cheney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and take all the fun out of the race?  Remember &#8220;potatoE&#8221; man Quayle? Come on, the fun part is waiting for the next dopey statement to drop, like the one yesterday. Palin thinks as Vice Pres she gets to run the Senate. I have a response to her: Ms. Palin, I know Dick Cheney and madam, you are no Dick Cheney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starbucks Baristas and Incentives for Store Activity by Chucktown Barista</title>
		<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/2008/10/starbucks-baristas-and-incentives-for-store-activity/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Chucktown Barista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/?p=142#comment-24</guid>
		<description>To Miranda the Customer: 

You are my Joe the Plumber. By that I mean you represent the mass of ignorant yet self-righteous Americans who are the first to open their mouths to complain about money being taken out of their pockets before they know the facts.

Miranda the Customer, no one is "begging for tips" out of your hard-earned money. The lucite tip boxes at Starbucks are subtle and unlabeled, and nowhere in your Starbucks experience will you be made to feel you should tip. That's just your bad conscience carping.

Miranda the Customer, I do have an education - I'll bet a better one than yours - and I am looking for a better paying job, no easy task in this economy for a war veteran who lost her small business during her overseas deployment. So let me tell you why, in the meantime, I'm working at Starbucks rather than McDonalds or Dunkin' Donuts.

SBux gave me 2 weeks' paid training that was well organized and thorough. It was so much information on the various aspects of the service I provide that I return frequently to the materials for refreshing. 

Then, Sbux spent millions in lost income and additional training just to refresh EVERYONE in their stores what a perfect shot of espresso looks and tastes like. All for you, Miranda the Customer.

In addition - and on my own time - I have been required to brew and taste every one of our coffee blends, and then write well-informed descriptions of their aroma, their mouth-feel, their taste and their finish, so that I can now describe about twenty SBux coffees as if I were a waiter in a white-table cloth restaurant, with some degree of knowledge and sophistication. What kind of look would you get from a Mickey D's or DD's counter person if you asked them to describe their ONE blend of coffee?

Oh, and I am also expected to have the same depth of knowledge about all of our food offerings, including being able to give suggestions to customers with specific dietary needs.

And then there is our merchandise. Not sure which coffee press would best suite your needs, or would make the best gift? There I am, willing to give you as much information - and my time - as you need to make your decision.

No, I don't serve you at your table. But I certainly have to clean up after you, both at the condiment bar and at your table, where you freely spill cream, sweeteners, and muffin crumbs, and leave all sorts of trash for others to clean up. And sometimes, yes, I do bring items to your table - even out to your car - without request, if I can see that you need assistance. You've brought your dog along on a hot day? I'm out there, giving it a bowl of cool water.

You come here regularly? I know your name, your drink preferences, even those of the spouse who's waiting out in the car. I wish you a happy birthday, congratulate you on your new job/engagement/baby, sympathize with your losses. You forgot your wallet? No problem - pay next time you come in. Because I've taken the time to get to know you. 

And, if you're the type who needs to order a triple grande vanilla latte, two shots decaf one regular, three pumps sugar-free vanilla one pump sugar-free hazelnut, half soy half nonfat, one hundred forty seven degrees, 2 splendas, with whip cream in a venti cup, why I'll take that order without laughing, make it for you perfectly and serve it with a smile. What, you forgot to ask for no foam? Here, let me make that for you again - free of charge.

All of this might make no difference to you, Miranda the Customer. For the majority of our customers, it does - and that accounts for their loyalty and their generosity. But if you truly feel that you're being being served by an over-paid version of a McDonald's employee, then I would strongly recommend you save yourself some money and patronize McDonald's instead, where you will never, ever be confronted by the nasty spector of The Unearned Tip.

(PS - better yet, why don't you save yourself alot of time and money and make your coffee at home?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Miranda the Customer: </p>
<p>You are my Joe the Plumber. By that I mean you represent the mass of ignorant yet self-righteous Americans who are the first to open their mouths to complain about money being taken out of their pockets before they know the facts.</p>
<p>Miranda the Customer, no one is &#8220;begging for tips&#8221; out of your hard-earned money. The lucite tip boxes at Starbucks are subtle and unlabeled, and nowhere in your Starbucks experience will you be made to feel you should tip. That&#8217;s just your bad conscience carping.</p>
<p>Miranda the Customer, I do have an education - I&#8217;ll bet a better one than yours - and I am looking for a better paying job, no easy task in this economy for a war veteran who lost her small business during her overseas deployment. So let me tell you why, in the meantime, I&#8217;m working at Starbucks rather than McDonalds or Dunkin&#8217; Donuts.</p>
<p>SBux gave me 2 weeks&#8217; paid training that was well organized and thorough. It was so much information on the various aspects of the service I provide that I return frequently to the materials for refreshing. </p>
<p>Then, Sbux spent millions in lost income and additional training just to refresh EVERYONE in their stores what a perfect shot of espresso looks and tastes like. All for you, Miranda the Customer.</p>
<p>In addition - and on my own time - I have been required to brew and taste every one of our coffee blends, and then write well-informed descriptions of their aroma, their mouth-feel, their taste and their finish, so that I can now describe about twenty SBux coffees as if I were a waiter in a white-table cloth restaurant, with some degree of knowledge and sophistication. What kind of look would you get from a Mickey D&#8217;s or DD&#8217;s counter person if you asked them to describe their ONE blend of coffee?</p>
<p>Oh, and I am also expected to have the same depth of knowledge about all of our food offerings, including being able to give suggestions to customers with specific dietary needs.</p>
<p>And then there is our merchandise. Not sure which coffee press would best suite your needs, or would make the best gift? There I am, willing to give you as much information - and my time - as you need to make your decision.</p>
<p>No, I don&#8217;t serve you at your table. But I certainly have to clean up after you, both at the condiment bar and at your table, where you freely spill cream, sweeteners, and muffin crumbs, and leave all sorts of trash for others to clean up. And sometimes, yes, I do bring items to your table - even out to your car - without request, if I can see that you need assistance. You&#8217;ve brought your dog along on a hot day? I&#8217;m out there, giving it a bowl of cool water.</p>
<p>You come here regularly? I know your name, your drink preferences, even those of the spouse who&#8217;s waiting out in the car. I wish you a happy birthday, congratulate you on your new job/engagement/baby, sympathize with your losses. You forgot your wallet? No problem - pay next time you come in. Because I&#8217;ve taken the time to get to know you. </p>
<p>And, if you&#8217;re the type who needs to order a triple grande vanilla latte, two shots decaf one regular, three pumps sugar-free vanilla one pump sugar-free hazelnut, half soy half nonfat, one hundred forty seven degrees, 2 splendas, with whip cream in a venti cup, why I&#8217;ll take that order without laughing, make it for you perfectly and serve it with a smile. What, you forgot to ask for no foam? Here, let me make that for you again - free of charge.</p>
<p>All of this might make no difference to you, Miranda the Customer. For the majority of our customers, it does - and that accounts for their loyalty and their generosity. But if you truly feel that you&#8217;re being being served by an over-paid version of a McDonald&#8217;s employee, then I would strongly recommend you save yourself some money and patronize McDonald&#8217;s instead, where you will never, ever be confronted by the nasty spector of The Unearned Tip.</p>
<p>(PS - better yet, why don&#8217;t you save yourself alot of time and money and make your coffee at home?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starbucks Baristas and Incentives for Store Activity by Chucktown Barista</title>
		<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/2008/10/starbucks-baristas-and-incentives-for-store-activity/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Chucktown Barista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/?p=142#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I'm blown away that anyone would take the time to give so much thought on how we're incentivized at our store - and I appreciate your consideration. 

The problem goes even further than losing tips because people no longer carry cash. We've had many customers - and I'm assuming they aren't regulars, since they are surprised when we inform them - who've wanted to leave tips on their receipts. The fact is, our credit card device is not programmed to print tip lines on the receipts.

I would guess the reason behind this might be two-fold. First, and perhaps most importantly, it takes someone time at the end of a shift to manually charge the tip onto the customer's credit card - ie, increased labor hours. A secondary consideration might be about appearances - if a customer sees a tip line on their receipt, they would know that they've just partaken of a service where tipping is customary - so without the tip line, Starbucks is avoiding the ill-will of the Mirandas of the world.

But then, why would a store that clearly expects its customers to cover part of its labor costs actually make it difficult for those (unlike Miranda) who truly wish to? I think that if that small change were made - allowing tips for both credit card and Starbucks card users who *wished* to tip - our generous customers would not feel embarrassed by not having tipped, we'd forgo having to thank them for their good intentions, and our weekly compensation would be healthier with little investment from Starbucks.

And to the Mirandas of the world: we always ask customers if they would like their receipts, to save printing paper. You can always decline your receipt and never be confronted by the nasty issue of tipping.

On tip-sharing with shift supervisors: I have to agree with the majority of our partners who side with Starbucks on this issue. Our shift supervisors spend a great deal of their time up front with us, serving customers and assisting us to ensure we have fresh coffee brewed and fresh pastries placed on display during our heaviest customer traffic, in addition to their ordering, stocking, and banking duties - they deserve the tips. And as someone who was some familiarity with labor law (at least in California), they do not technically fulfill a key job under the definition of "management": they do not hire and fire. 

So if one way we, the barista partners, could be more profitably remunerated through our existing tips is to stop paying shift supervisors from the tip pool, then I would insist that Starbucks step up and bridge the gap in their hourly wage by paying them far more than just $1-2/hour for their increased responsibilities.

The profit-sharing for increases in store traffic is an interesting idea, but I don't think it's workable. For one thing, store traffic depends on so many factors beyond the baristas' control: location, special events (like Octoberfest mentioned above), the coming and going of nearby competition, the economy, and Starbucks' own policies and promotions. For examples of the latter, we lost a certain portion of our coffee-drinking regulars with the introduction of the Pike's Place blend as our "everyday" coffee, reducing the choices among blends favored by our longtime customers; then there was a spike in afternoon sales during the "$2 grande after 2pm" promotion.

In my opinion, the best way that we as baristas can be expected to supplement our below-living-wage hourly income via customer generosity is to be allowed to deliver the quality of customer service that Starbucks made itself known for. 

Our bind is that this is simply not possible when the volume of traffic increases past the capacity of the staff to serve customers efficiently. You may have heard that Starbucks has redesigned its scheduling practice, which is great in some respects, but the cost of the hidden labor-hours saved will be paid by overworked baristas and waiting customers. These conditions do not foster an environment in which I can get to know you as a customer, to share my coffee knowledge with you, turn you on to something you haven't tried before, or simply to make that brief human contact that can brighten both of our days. 

I'm not suggesting Starbucks increase its labor costs just so that we may increase our tips. But I would argue that understaffing creates an unpleasant, stressed-out environment common to any fast-food restaurant. If Starbucks wants to avoid becoming just an expensive version of McDonald's, it needs to take that cost into consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m blown away that anyone would take the time to give so much thought on how we&#8217;re incentivized at our store - and I appreciate your consideration. </p>
<p>The problem goes even further than losing tips because people no longer carry cash. We&#8217;ve had many customers - and I&#8217;m assuming they aren&#8217;t regulars, since they are surprised when we inform them - who&#8217;ve wanted to leave tips on their receipts. The fact is, our credit card device is not programmed to print tip lines on the receipts.</p>
<p>I would guess the reason behind this might be two-fold. First, and perhaps most importantly, it takes someone time at the end of a shift to manually charge the tip onto the customer&#8217;s credit card - ie, increased labor hours. A secondary consideration might be about appearances - if a customer sees a tip line on their receipt, they would know that they&#8217;ve just partaken of a service where tipping is customary - so without the tip line, Starbucks is avoiding the ill-will of the Mirandas of the world.</p>
<p>But then, why would a store that clearly expects its customers to cover part of its labor costs actually make it difficult for those (unlike Miranda) who truly wish to? I think that if that small change were made - allowing tips for both credit card and Starbucks card users who *wished* to tip - our generous customers would not feel embarrassed by not having tipped, we&#8217;d forgo having to thank them for their good intentions, and our weekly compensation would be healthier with little investment from Starbucks.</p>
<p>And to the Mirandas of the world: we always ask customers if they would like their receipts, to save printing paper. You can always decline your receipt and never be confronted by the nasty issue of tipping.</p>
<p>On tip-sharing with shift supervisors: I have to agree with the majority of our partners who side with Starbucks on this issue. Our shift supervisors spend a great deal of their time up front with us, serving customers and assisting us to ensure we have fresh coffee brewed and fresh pastries placed on display during our heaviest customer traffic, in addition to their ordering, stocking, and banking duties - they deserve the tips. And as someone who was some familiarity with labor law (at least in California), they do not technically fulfill a key job under the definition of &#8220;management&#8221;: they do not hire and fire. </p>
<p>So if one way we, the barista partners, could be more profitably remunerated through our existing tips is to stop paying shift supervisors from the tip pool, then I would insist that Starbucks step up and bridge the gap in their hourly wage by paying them far more than just $1-2/hour for their increased responsibilities.</p>
<p>The profit-sharing for increases in store traffic is an interesting idea, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s workable. For one thing, store traffic depends on so many factors beyond the baristas&#8217; control: location, special events (like Octoberfest mentioned above), the coming and going of nearby competition, the economy, and Starbucks&#8217; own policies and promotions. For examples of the latter, we lost a certain portion of our coffee-drinking regulars with the introduction of the Pike&#8217;s Place blend as our &#8220;everyday&#8221; coffee, reducing the choices among blends favored by our longtime customers; then there was a spike in afternoon sales during the &#8220;$2 grande after 2pm&#8221; promotion.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the best way that we as baristas can be expected to supplement our below-living-wage hourly income via customer generosity is to be allowed to deliver the quality of customer service that Starbucks made itself known for. </p>
<p>Our bind is that this is simply not possible when the volume of traffic increases past the capacity of the staff to serve customers efficiently. You may have heard that Starbucks has redesigned its scheduling practice, which is great in some respects, but the cost of the hidden labor-hours saved will be paid by overworked baristas and waiting customers. These conditions do not foster an environment in which I can get to know you as a customer, to share my coffee knowledge with you, turn you on to something you haven&#8217;t tried before, or simply to make that brief human contact that can brighten both of our days. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting Starbucks increase its labor costs just so that we may increase our tips. But I would argue that understaffing creates an unpleasant, stressed-out environment common to any fast-food restaurant. If Starbucks wants to avoid becoming just an expensive version of McDonald&#8217;s, it needs to take that cost into consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starbucks Baristas and Incentives for Store Activity by Miranda</title>
		<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/2008/10/starbucks-baristas-and-incentives-for-store-activity/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/?p=142#comment-22</guid>
		<description>PS: Making coffee is barely worth $8 an hour. If you're lucky. Be glad you aren't in Asia where they pay slave wages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: Making coffee is barely worth $8 an hour. If you&#8217;re lucky. Be glad you aren&#8217;t in Asia where they pay slave wages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starbucks Baristas and Incentives for Store Activity by Miranda</title>
		<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/2008/10/starbucks-baristas-and-incentives-for-store-activity/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/?p=142#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Once more for the cheap seats . . . 

They are making coffee and taking cash. Occasionally, they (gasp) heat up something. Why do they deserve tips? They don't bring the drink to my table, they don't offer to fill it up again, they don't provide any service beyond that of a McDonald's employee.

I'm SO tired of everyone in the world begging for tips. Too bad if you don't think you make enough money. Drop the "but I'm a coffee expert" bit, get an education and get a better-paying job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once more for the cheap seats . . . </p>
<p>They are making coffee and taking cash. Occasionally, they (gasp) heat up something. Why do they deserve tips? They don&#8217;t bring the drink to my table, they don&#8217;t offer to fill it up again, they don&#8217;t provide any service beyond that of a McDonald&#8217;s employee.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m SO tired of everyone in the world begging for tips. Too bad if you don&#8217;t think you make enough money. Drop the &#8220;but I&#8217;m a coffee expert&#8221; bit, get an education and get a better-paying job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Starbucks Baristas and Incentives for Store Activity by Zack!</title>
		<link>http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/2008/10/starbucks-baristas-and-incentives-for-store-activity/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 02:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryderkessler.com/blog/?p=142#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Interesting piece.  I'll have to think about that for a while.  By the way, I happen to be a shift at a Bucks, somewhere in Kansas...
Thanks for taking the time to put that down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting piece.  I&#8217;ll have to think about that for a while.  By the way, I happen to be a shift at a Bucks, somewhere in Kansas&#8230;<br />
Thanks for taking the time to put that down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
